人機大戰團隊賽對人不公平？李世乭很生氣！

李世乭參加韓國節目“李世乭的視線”時回憶人機大戰，關於柯潔與AlphaGo人機大戰時，時越、羋昱廷、唐韋星、陳耀燁、周睿羊等五位世界冠軍團隊對抗AlphaGo的比賽提出自己的觀點。

韓國網友翻譯原文如下：

（About Team Go against AlphaGo） 5 players are too many for the group Go game。 For 5 members， they should have been given more than 5 hours of thinking time。 The group game also requires a very comfortable place for players to discuss。 It would have been better if there were a disclosed room rather than a open place。 Then they could organize someone who sits in front of the board to put stones for them as Doctor Aja Huang did for AlphaGo。

I agree the pair game was an event match but I think the group game was different。 It was 勝負。 Nevertheless its circumstance was not very good。 Compared to a single play， was it be really a better condition for human players？ It was the question I half jokingly asked before。

And this is my personal opinion but I felt the team played this game quite casually。 It is good to enjoy the game but I could not think they really did their best。 However， wasn‘t the Team Go suggested as one of the best alternatives for human players to overcome AlphaGo？ It is a pity that the rule or the game environment were not well prepared but still， shouldn’t they have tried everything they could in a given set of circumstances？ Ke Jie was the representative of human but they also represented the professional Go players。 Media reported that even the cooperation of human champions could not overcome AlphaGo。 However， the game was too messy to say it was their best。（Caster： Lee 9 dan， are you angry？） Yes。

中文翻譯如下：

（關於五位世界冠軍組團對抗AlphaGo的比賽）

5個人對於圍棋團隊來說太多了。因爲有5位棋手，他們有超過5小時的思考時間，並且獲得了一個很舒適的討論環境。但是如果在一個封閉的環境或許比公開的環境更好。他們可以安排一個人在棋盤前擺棋，像黃博士替AlphaGo落子那樣。

我同意兩人對戰是匹配的，但是多人對戰則不同。那就是勝負。儘管環境很不好。與單人對局相比，難道團隊對戰對棋手來說真的是更好的規則嗎？這個是我之前半開玩笑提出的問題。

這是我個人的觀點但是我感覺這個團隊對戰確實有些漫不經心。團隊對戰能夠很好的享受比賽，但是我認爲沒有人能夠發揮他的最好水平。接受建議組成一個非傳統的圍棋團隊就能戰勝AlphaGo了嗎？很遺憾比賽的規則和環境仍然不如預期。難道是因爲他們在賽場沒有盡他們他們所能盡最大努力嗎？柯潔不僅代表了人類棋手，更代表了職業棋手，媒體報道即便是世界冠軍的組合仍然不能戰勝AlphaGo，然而這次比賽很難說是他們的最好水平。